&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for the 'special needs funding' Category

Oct 24 2008

Sarah Palin’s Special Needs Policy

special needs, ADHD, special needs funding, politics, autism, Asperger's, election, news, special education, support, inclusion, IDEA, school, internet, Sarah Palin, blogs

Or lack of policy, more accurately.

Governor Palin gave a speech in Pittsburgh today.  I’m scouring the Internet, but so far have been unable to find video of the speech, but I have found some information , including a transcript of the speech. After reading it, I still don’t see anything new or particularly substantial about her plans, and I find some of her words contradictory to her past actions.

She did mention fully funding IDEA - great, only 11 days before the election and about a year after Senator Obama mentioned his intention to do so.  She talks about school choice for students with special needs, but some states already provide at least some level of choice.  Expanding that would certainly be a nice idea, but with the spending freeze that Senator McCain called for during the debates, where is the funding coming from?  Governor Palin claims that by reallocating funds already in the budget it can be done, but she neglects to give concrete information as to how.

In a Chicago Tribune article, quoted at Autismvox , her plans apparently include boosting early childhood funding until age 3, but what is supposed to happen to those children after age 3?

A couple of other issues are distressing.  First, she claimed that the special education budget in Alaska would have been tripled by 2011, but a big chunk of that funding increase is for a program called the Alaska Youth Challenge Academy, a boot camp for dropouts with behavioral issues.  Autism, Down’s Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, ADHD…none of these, nor a host of other special needs, are ‘behavioral issues,’ so where is the funding for those students who wouldn’t be served by being in a boot camp?  When given the opportunity to advocate for individuals with special needs in Colorado, she opposed an amendment that would raise funds for those waiting for services - about 12000 people.

Governor Palin got in a dig at the Obama campaign, and her digs have been nothing but misrepresentations and double standards up to this point, by saying that his tax plan would tax trusts that parents establish for their special needs children, which is inaccurate.  As one commenter on the CBS News blog said:

“Sure, any special needs individual who is lucky enough to have a NET EARNING of $250000 per year in INTEREST FROM TRUST FUND will be affected a bit. We are talking about trust funds well above $5.000000 here. How many kids will be affected, I wonder? I”d love to see statistics on that.


Posted by odnarusalka”Governor Palin fails to mention that the McCain-Palin health plan would allow insurers to deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions.  Finally, Governor Palin spoke about the fact that children with disabilites grow up and that there needs to be support for them as adults as well.  Yet, she has yet to act on Maria Shriver’s call to Governors to employ disabled adults, and John McCain opposed the Community Choice Act, as mentioned in Becky Blitch’s blog.  So once again, the sound bites sound interesting but there doesn’t seem like there is much in the way of specifics, action, accuracy or truth where the Governor is concerned.  If this was her Hail Mary play, she seems to have just missed the goal.

Advertise Here with Today.com

3 responses so far

Oct 16 2008

Thursday Thankfulness: Post-Debate Edition

ADHD, Asperger's, autism, doctors, election, IDEA, news, politics, Sarah Palin, special needs, special needs funding, support, thankfulness

I think first and foremost, I’m thankful that last night was the last presidential debate.  I’ve had enough of hearing the same thing over and over, and I’m really tired of McCain’s angry sniping.  Anyway, my thankfulness:

1. I’m glad someone FINALLY talked about special needs families and that Obama came out and said he wants to fully fund IDEA.  And for all Sarah Palin’s assertions that she would fight for families with special needs, her state seems to be a bit behind the times in terms of providing support.  Also, I was a bit disturbed that McCain seemed more focused on finding a cause for autism than dealing with the present lack of support for so many individuals.  He mentioned that we shouldn’t just ‘throw more money at the problems with schools.

2. I am thankful for the existence of Roe v. Wade and more than a little offended at McCain’s characterization as people who are pro-choice as being pro-abortion.  I don’t know if there is really anyone who is pro-abortion (and if there are those folks, they are in an incredibly small minority).  I mean get real - no one wants to just go wantonly killing unborn babies.  But there have to be options available when circumstances dictate.  You cannot mandate a person’s body.  And how dare he belittle the health of a mother as a valid concern?!

3. I am thankful that Obama finally mentioned the real cost of health care in response to McCain’s $5000 refund.  That would be great if you could actually get a decent health plan for that much, but according to the National Coalition on Healthcare , the annual premium on a family plan averages around $12,000.  Quite frankly, I don’t have$7 grand to dish out so that my kids can go to the doctor, especially since one of them sees specialists several times a year.  And McCain keeps talking about competition between states - how does that help?  Does he really expect people to travel to other states for health coverage?  Our current health plan is based in another county.  Now, we have decent coverage, but most of the doctors inthe network plan are in the county where the plan is based.  We can go out of network, but the cost is prohibitive.  So, that means I have to travel an hour to go to the doctor.  Guess what - I don’t go to the doctor very often.  My primary doctor is now relatively local, but my husband’s is not.  So when he injured himself and couldn’t drive an hour, that was a problem.  Now, that’s within the same state.  How are people supposed to manage that if they have to travel out of state to receive certain benefits?  And if anyone thinks insurance agencies won’t do that, please guess again.  As it is, we’re traveling an hour to see Gus’s specialist (Pediatric Developmental Specialist) because we, in 2.5 years of living here, haven’t found a local specialist who takes our plan.

4. I am thankful that the debate was not more eventful than it was because I wasn’t tempted to stay up afterward.  I got a decent night’s sleep for a change!  And now that Gus is feeling better, he slept to a good time this morning too, which hopefully means a good day for him.

I hope my views haven’t offended anyone, and I’d love for you to comment withyour own gratitude!  Look at the bright side, in just over 2 weeks, you probably won’t have to read any more about politics from this mom.  Have a great Thursday!

7 responses so far

Sep 27 2008

Thoughts on Last Night’s Debate

Asperger's, autism, election, IDEA, news, politics, problem behavior, special education, special needs, special needs funding, support AP Photo by Charles Dharapak - notice how McCain Still refuses to look at Obama!

My decision was not swayed after watching last night’s debate, but I gained a bit of insight into John McCain that was a bit disturbing.  I am even more concerned than ever about that man getting into the top office of this country for two reasons.

Although the debate was supposed to be about foreign policy, there was no way to avoid at least some discussion of our domestic economy.  When pressed on the issue of what would have to be foregone from his plans in light of the proposed bailout, John McCain’s response was that there should be a freeze on spending except for veterans, the military, and institutions like Medicare.  No mention whatsoever about people with special needs or children or pretty much anyone else in the country in need of support.  One reason this bothers me is that his running mate vowed to make families of people with special needs a priority.  Did McCain not get her memo?

I look at his reaction as having one of two causes.  Either it was an emotional reaction and he didn’t really mean it as drastically as he made it sound, or he totally meant it and never intended to support individuals with special needs in the first place.  Whichever way you look at it, it’s a problem.

Let’s say he was just experiencing a knee-jerk moment - it happens to the best of us under pressure, right?  That doesn’t make it the best way to deal with a situation.  His blanket spending freeze would be akin to me saying to my family, “Okay, we’re spending too much in this house, so going forward, that’s it - no more spending!”

“But Mommy, what about food?”

“Start rationing out those hot dogs and suck it up!”

Not the most practical solution.  And while it’s a big enough mistake for me to have those kids of periodic emotional overreactions with my family, it’s way worse for the leader of a country to not be able to hold himself in check, take a breath, and make a more rational decision.

Now suppose he wasn’t being emotional and overreacting.  I’m not sure if IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) funding falls into the same category as Medicare.  If not, without that funding, it will be even harder to get services for our special needs children than it already is.  That’s not looking out for special needs.  That’s kicking us right in the butt.  Clearly this is not an issue of particular value to him.

My other major concern about McCain’s performance last night was the fact that he didn’t look at Senator Obama once during the entire 90 minutes.  As anyone with a child with autism knows, lack of eye contact is one of the first markers in diagnosing the condition, so I know a bit about it after seven years.  Not only did he refuse to make eye contact, he wouldn’t even look in Obama’s direction.  His body language was rude, juvenile, dismissive, angry, and completely inappropriate for someone wanting to lead a nation.   My five year old refuses to look at someone when she’s angry at them.  I would not put her in the president’s office to deal with foreign leaders.  If he can’t bring himself to look at his opponent during a debate, how the heck is he going to conduct himself with other world leaders?  I read a great post the other day about eye contact in public speaking at the Communication Exchange .  I’m curious to see how Patricia reacts to the debate.

So, I am now convinced more than ever that if McCain is elected, support for individuals with special needs is going to dry up despite a promise to the contrary, and the security of the country is going to be even shakier than ever.  But that’s just me.  Maybe I just don’t really understand, like McCain repeatedly tried to convince us Obama doesn’t.  I think McCain’s the one who lacks understanding.  Your thoughts?

8 responses so far

Advertise Here