My Autism Insights

Or lack of policy, more accurately.

Governor Palin gave a speech in Pittsburgh today.  I’m scouring the Internet, but so far have been unable to find video of the speech, but I have found some information , including a transcript of the speech. After reading it, I still don’t see anything new or particularly substantial about her plans, and I find some of her words contradictory to her past actions.

She did mention fully funding IDEA - great, only 11 days before the election and about a year after Senator Obama mentioned his intention to do so.  She talks about school choice for students with special needs, but some states already provide at least some level of choice.  Expanding that would certainly be a nice idea, but with the spending freeze that Senator McCain called for during the debates, where is the funding coming from?  Governor Palin claims that by reallocating funds already in the budget it can be done, but she neglects to give concrete information as to how.

In a Chicago Tribune article, quoted at Autismvox , her plans apparently include boosting early childhood funding until age 3, but what is supposed to happen to those children after age 3?

A couple of other issues are distressing.  First, she claimed that the special education budget in Alaska would have been tripled by 2011, but a big chunk of that funding increase is for a program called the Alaska Youth Challenge Academy, a boot camp for dropouts with behavioral issues.  Autism, Down’s Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, ADHD…none of these, nor a host of other special needs, are ‘behavioral issues,’ so where is the funding for those students who wouldn’t be served by being in a boot camp?  When given the opportunity to advocate for individuals with special needs in Colorado, she opposed an amendment that would raise funds for those waiting for services - about 12000 people.

Governor Palin got in a dig at the Obama campaign, and her digs have been nothing but misrepresentations and double standards up to this point, by saying that his tax plan would tax trusts that parents establish for their special needs children, which is inaccurate.  As one commenter on the CBS News blog said:

“Sure, any special needs individual who is lucky enough to have a NET EARNING of $250000 per year in INTEREST FROM TRUST FUND will be affected a bit. We are talking about trust funds well above $5.000000 here. How many kids will be affected, I wonder? I”d love to see statistics on that.

---

Posted by odnarusalka”Governor Palin fails to mention that the McCain-Palin health plan would allow insurers to deny coverage to those with pre-existing conditions.  Finally, Governor Palin spoke about the fact that children with disabilites grow up and that there needs to be support for them as adults as well.  Yet, she has yet to act on Maria Shriver’s call to Governors to employ disabled adults, and John McCain opposed the Community Choice Act, as mentioned in Becky Blitch’s blog.  So once again, the sound bites sound interesting but there doesn’t seem like there is much in the way of specifics, action, accuracy or truth where the Governor is concerned.  If this was her Hail Mary play, she seems to have just missed the goal.

I think first and foremost, I’m thankful that last night was the last presidential debate.  I’ve had enough of hearing the same thing over and over, and I’m really tired of McCain’s angry sniping.  Anyway, my thankfulness:

1. I’m glad someone FINALLY talked about special needs families and that Obama came out and said he wants to fully fund IDEA.  And for all Sarah Palin’s assertions that she would fight for families with special needs, her state seems to be a bit behind the times in terms of providing support.  Also, I was a bit disturbed that McCain seemed more focused on finding a cause for autism than dealing with the present lack of support for so many individuals.  He mentioned that we shouldn’t just ‘throw more money at the problems with schools.

2. I am thankful for the existence of Roe v. Wade and more than a little offended at McCain’s characterization as people who are pro-choice as being pro-abortion.  I don’t know if there is really anyone who is pro-abortion (and if there are those folks, they are in an incredibly small minority).  I mean get real - no one wants to just go wantonly killing unborn babies.  But there have to be options available when circumstances dictate.  You cannot mandate a person’s body.  And how dare he belittle the health of a mother as a valid concern?!

3. I am thankful that Obama finally mentioned the real cost of health care in response to McCain’s $5000 refund.  That would be great if you could actually get a decent health plan for that much, but according to the National Coalition on Healthcare , the annual premium on a family plan averages around $12,000.  Quite frankly, I don’t have$7 grand to dish out so that my kids can go to the doctor, especially since one of them sees specialists several times a year.  And McCain keeps talking about competition between states - how does that help?  Does he really expect people to travel to other states for health coverage?  Our current health plan is based in another county.  Now, we have decent coverage, but most of the doctors inthe network plan are in the county where the plan is based.  We can go out of network, but the cost is prohibitive.  So, that means I have to travel an hour to go to the doctor.  Guess what - I don’t go to the doctor very often.  My primary doctor is now relatively local, but my husband’s is not.  So when he injured himself and couldn’t drive an hour, that was a problem.  Now, that’s within the same state.  How are people supposed to manage that if they have to travel out of state to receive certain benefits?  And if anyone thinks insurance agencies won’t do that, please guess again.  As it is, we’re traveling an hour to see Gus’s specialist (Pediatric Developmental Specialist) because we, in 2.5 years of living here, haven’t found a local specialist who takes our plan.

4. I am thankful that the debate was not more eventful than it was because I wasn’t tempted to stay up afterward.  I got a decent night’s sleep for a change!  And now that Gus is feeling better, he slept to a good time this morning too, which hopefully means a good day for him.

I hope my views haven’t offended anyone, and I’d love for you to comment withyour own gratitude!  Look at the bright side, in just over 2 weeks, you probably won’t have to read any more about politics from this mom.  Have a great Thursday!

I read about this yesterday: ADAPT , an advocacy organization working to get better support for people with disabilities to have better housing instead of being relegated to institutions or nursing homes, had an interesting experience with the presidential nominees’ campaigns.

ADAPT took a delegation to Washington in order to meet with HUD (Housing and Urban Development), the Obama campaign, and the McCain campaign.  These meetings occurred separately.  In a nutshell, HUD was unable to help and politely communicated as such, the Obama campaign people listened respectfully.  The McCain campaign, well, they were not quite so nice.  They had more than 15 ADAPT members arrested because of their non-violent protest.

So just to be clear, there was a group of about 100 people peacefully protesting for better living conditions for people with special needs.  And the McCain campaign not only refused to even accept materials for proposals, but had the  protesters arrested.  Oh, and there was at least one injury as a result.  This is the same campaign that Sarah Palin became part of when she pledged her friendship to families of people with special needs.  I guess the same pledge doesn’t include the actual PEOPLE with said special needs.

Yep, thanks, Sarah.  You’re a real pal.

    AP Photo by Susan Walsh

I’m not going to turn this into a political blog, but for days now I’ve had something nagging at me, which means the words want to come out.  I will caveat my statements by pointing out that I’m a Democrat and wouldn’t vote for the Republican ticket no matter what.  I am, however, paying attention because if this team happens to win and they are running the country, I’ll be effected as much as the next guy.  And so will my son.  The one with the special needs.

In her convention speech, Governor Palin said, “To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming place for your sons and daughters.

I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House.”

I don’t know about that.

I’m not interested in the fact that she’s got a teenage daughter who’s pregnant.  It happens.  I do find it interesting that she wants her daughter’s choice to have this baby to be left alone, and it should be.  I find it commendable and wonderful that Governor Palin chose to have her youngest son knowing that he’d have Down’s Syndrome.  I find it disturbing that while it seems the Palins should be allowed their choices, the rest of the country, including those who do not have the same resources and support that this family does, should be denied a choice.  But I digress…

I am also very skeptical of her vow to be a friend to families of special needs children.  “Oh, but she’s a parent of a child with special needs,” you might say.  So?  Here’s what I don’t get: She went back to work three days after her son was born.  Now maybe it’s not so taxing to run the state of Alaska while still providing children, one with special needs, with all the care they require and deserve.  I’m sure she’s excellent at multi-tasking.  But Alaska isn’t the White House.  Something, in my opinion, would have to give.  Clearly, her career is her priority, and that’s just fine - to each their own.

When Gus was born, I had a career that I loved, and it was taking off nicely.  Even before his diagnosis, I decided that I wanted him (and later my daughter) to be my priority.  So I let one career go and have developed another.  My kids came first.  Now, I’m not saying everyone should have to do the same - I believe in choice - but if the governor’s children, her new baby in particular, aren’t her priority and focus, how can I expect that my child would be any more important to her?

I know plenty of moms with special-needs children who work, by the way.  I think most of the ones I know have either made some adjustments to their careers to be more available for their child (like I did) or would jump at the chance if they could.  It’s not just being at home playing with the child; there is a whole realm of advocacy and constantly being on top of what’s going on in the child’s life that just can’t be done if you’re doing something like running a country. I’m not being anti-feminist, just realistic.

There are other issues I have with Governor Palin that I won’t address here because it’s not the place for them.  I just really wish that the people of this country would look past all the rhetoric and glitz of all these candidates with a critical eye, analyzing not only what they say in their carefully orchestrated speeches but what they do.  Forget what all the news stations are prattling about - stop for a minute and think about what we’re being shown.  Am I way off base on Palin?  I don’t think I am, but I could be wrong.  What are your thoughts?